What is Epistemic Updating?

⸺

  • “Epistemic updating refers to the process of revising one’s beliefs or knowledge in light of new evidence or information.” This quote outlines the fundamental concept of epistemic updating as central to maintaining rationality and coherence in our belief systems.
  • “Bayesian updating, grounded in Bayes’ Theorem, provides a mathematical model for updating the probability of hypotheses based on observed evidence.” This highlights the significance of Bayesian updating as a formal framework for epistemic updating, emphasizing the role of probabilistic reasoning in revising beliefs.
  • “Rationality: Ideally, epistemic updating should be guided by principles of logic, objectivity, and open-mindedness to minimize biases and errors.” This quote emphasizes the ideal guiding principles for epistemic updating, highlighting the goal of achieving rational and unbiased belief revision.
  • “Without effective epistemic updating, scientific progress would stall,” emphasizing the indispensable role of epistemic updating in scientific discovery and the continuous advancement of knowledge.

Table of Contents: (Click any link below to navigate to that section.)

  1. What is epistemic updating?
  2. Provide three contexts in which epistemic updating is critical.
    1. 1. Medical Diagnosis and Treatment
    2. 2. Scientific Research and Theory Development
    3. 3. Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
  3. Create a 10-item quiz on epistemic updating with answers at the end.
    1. Quiz: Epistemic Updating
    2. Answers
    3. Epistemic Updating Quiz:
  4. Provide 15 discussion questions relevant to epistemic updating.
    1. Discussion Questions on Epistemic Updating:

What is epistemic updating?

Epistemic updating refers to the process of revising one’s beliefs or knowledge in light of new evidence or information. This concept is central to epistemology, the branch of philosophy concerned with the nature, scope, and limits of knowledge and belief. Epistemic updating is fundamental to rationality, embodying the idea that a rational agent should adjust their beliefs according to the evidence available to them, aiming to maintain a coherent and justified set of beliefs that reflects the world as accurately as possible.

There are several formal frameworks and methodologies for epistemic updating, among which Bayesian updating is perhaps the most notable. Bayesian updating, grounded in Bayes’ Theorem, provides a mathematical model for updating the probability of hypotheses based on observed evidence. In this framework, beliefs are treated as probabilistic, and the process of updating involves adjusting the probabilities of these beliefs in a manner consistent with the principles of probability theory.

Key aspects of epistemic updating include:

  1. Prior Beliefs: The beliefs held before encountering new evidence. In Bayesian terms, these are referred to as “prior probabilities.”
  2. New Evidence: Information or data that was not previously considered. The impact of new evidence on beliefs is central to the process of epistemic updating.
  3. Posterior Beliefs: The revised beliefs after considering new evidence. In Bayesian updating, these are the “posterior probabilities,” calculated by applying Bayes’ Theorem to the prior probabilities and the likelihood of the new evidence given those priors.
  4. Rationality and Coherence: Epistemic updating is driven by the goal of maintaining rationality and coherence among one’s beliefs. Rationality involves adjusting beliefs according to the rules of logic and probability theory, while coherence requires that one’s belief system remains internally consistent and aligned with the evidence.
  5. Openness to Change: A key principle of epistemic updating is the willingness to revise beliefs in the face of new, compelling evidence. This openness to change is essential for intellectual growth and for avoiding dogmatism.

Epistemic updating is not only a topic of interest in philosophy but also plays a crucial role in scientific inquiry, decision theory, and artificial intelligence, among other fields. It represents a systematic approach to belief revision, emphasizing the importance of evidence-based reasoning and the continuous refinement of our understanding of the world.

Epistemic updating refers to the process of how individuals adjust their beliefs based on new information and experiences. It’s a crucial aspect of knowledge acquisition and a complex field of study within philosophy and cognitive science.

Here are some key points about epistemic updating:

What it involves:

  • Starting point: Epistemic updating always begins with an existing set of beliefs, opinions, and uncertainties.
  • New information: This can be anything from personal observations, data analysis, scientific findings, testimony from others, or even simply changing perspectives.
  • Evaluation: This stage involves critically assessing the new information, considering its source, reliability, and potential biases.
  • Revision: Based on the evaluation, individuals might choose to:
    • Retain their existing beliefs: If the new information doesn’t provide strong enough evidence to warrant change.
    • Modify their beliefs: To partially integrate the new information, perhaps adjusting their degree of certainty or nuanced viewpoints.
    • Completely revise their beliefs: If the new information is overwhelmingly compelling and contradicts their existing understanding.

Key considerations:

  • Rationality: Ideally, epistemic updating should be guided by principles of logic, objectivity, and open-mindedness to minimize biases and errors.
  • Individual differences: People differ in their approaches to updating beliefs, influenced by factors like cognitive styles, personality traits, and cultural background.
  • External factors: Social environments, authority figures, and propaganda can also influence how individuals process new information and update their beliefs.

Areas of study:

  • Philosophy: Various philosophical discussions revolve around epistemic updating, such as the justification of belief, the Gettier problem, and the nature of knowledge itself.
  • Cognitive science: Researchers explore how the brain processes new information, updates mental models, and makes decisions based on changing beliefs.
  • Artificial intelligence: Developing AI systems that can learn and adapt requires understanding principles of epistemic updating for effective decision-making.

Overall, epistemic updating is a dynamic and multifaceted process that shapes our understanding of the world and how we act within it. Understanding its complexities can help us become more critical thinkers, open to new information while maintaining intellectual rigor and avoiding biases.

Provide three contexts in which epistemic updating is critical.

Epistemic updating is crucial in numerous contexts where new information must be integrated with existing knowledge to make decisions, form accurate beliefs, or develop theories. Here are three contexts in which epistemic updating plays a critical role:

1. Medical Diagnosis and Treatment

In the medical field, practitioners frequently encounter new information that can significantly impact the diagnosis and treatment of patients. As new symptoms are observed, test results come in, or new research findings are published, healthcare professionals must update their beliefs about a patient’s condition and the efficacy of treatments.

  • Example: A doctor initially diagnoses a patient with a common illness based on prevalent symptoms. However, upon receiving lab test results that are inconsistent with the initial diagnosis, the doctor must update their belief about the patient’s condition, possibly considering a less common illness. Furthermore, as new research provides evidence about more effective treatments or reveals side effects of current medications, physicians need to update their treatment plans to optimize patient care.

2. Scientific Research and Theory Development

Scientific inquiry is fundamentally based on the process of hypothesis testing, data collection, and theory revision. As scientists gather new data, they must update their theories and models to reflect this information accurately. This process is essential for the progression of scientific knowledge, allowing for the refinement of theories and the abandonment of those that no longer align with the empirical evidence.

  • Example: In climate science, researchers continually incorporate new data from satellite measurements, ocean buoys, and climate models into their understanding of climate change. As new evidence about the rate of ice melt, sea-level rise, or global temperature trends becomes available, scientists must update their models and predictions about future climate scenarios, potentially leading to revised recommendations for policy and action.

3. Financial Markets and Investment Strategies

The financial markets are highly dynamic, with prices influenced by a myriad of factors including economic indicators, corporate earnings reports, and geopolitical events. Investors and financial analysts must continuously update their beliefs about the value and future prospects of investments based on the latest information to make informed decisions.

  • Example: An investor holds stocks in a technology firm and learns through a new earnings report that the company’s profits have significantly exceeded expectations. Additionally, a new technological breakthrough by the company has the potential to disrupt the market. Given this new information, the investor must update their assessment of the company’s future growth prospects and decide whether to adjust their investment strategy by buying more shares, holding their current position, or selling.

In each of these contexts, epistemic updating is not just beneficial but critical for making informed, rational decisions that reflect the best available evidence. Failure to adequately update beliefs in light of new information can lead to suboptimal decisions, persistent errors in judgment, and, in some cases, significant adverse outcomes.

Here are three contexts where epistemic updating is critical:

1. Scientific Discovery: At the heart of science lies the continuous process of questioning existing knowledge and updating it based on new evidence. Scientists gather data through experiments, observations, and theoretical exploration. They then critically evaluate this information, revise their hypotheses, and ultimately draw conclusions that contribute to our understanding of the world. Without effective epistemic updating, scientific progress would stall, unable to incorporate new discoveries and refine our grasp of reality.

2. Personal Decision-Making: Navigating daily life requires constant decisions, from small choices like what to eat to weighty ethical dilemmas. Effective decision-making relies on updating our beliefs about the world, ourselves, and our options based on new information. This involves critically assessing news articles, expert opinions, personal experiences, and our own biases to choose the course of action aligned with our values and understanding of the situation. Poor epistemic updating can lead to rash decisions, missed opportunities, or unintended consequences.

3. Social and Political Engagement: Understanding complex social and political issues requires continuous epistemic updating. We need to critically evaluate information sources, listen to diverse perspectives, and consider counterarguments to update our beliefs about social structures, economic systems, and political ideologies. Failing to do so can lead to biases, misinformation, and polarization, hindering our ability to engage constructively in civic discourse and work towards positive change.

These are just a few examples, and the importance of epistemic updating extends to various fields like law, medicine, education, and even personal relationships. It’s a fundamental skill that empowers us to navigate the ever-changing world around us with informed and adaptable reasoning. Remember, good epistemic updating doesn’t demand constant revisions based on any new information but involves critical evaluation and selective integration of trustworthy evidence to refine our understanding and guide our actions effectively.

Create a 10-item quiz on epistemic updating with answers at the end.

Quiz: Epistemic Updating

Question 1: What does epistemic updating involve?

  • A) Ignoring new information to maintain one’s initial beliefs.
  • B) Revising one’s beliefs in light of new evidence or information.
  • C) Memorizing facts without understanding them.
  • D) Rejecting scientific evidence in favor of personal opinion.

Question 2: In the context of Bayesian updating, what is a “prior”?

  • A) The probability of an event after new evidence is considered.
  • B) A hypothesis that is proven to be true.
  • C) The initial probability of a hypothesis before new evidence is taken into account.
  • D) The likelihood of new evidence being relevant.

Question 3: Which of the following best describes “posterior probability”?

  • A) The probability of the hypothesis before considering the evidence.
  • B) The revised probability of the hypothesis after considering new evidence.
  • C) The probability of the evidence itself.
  • D) The probability of the evidence given the hypothesis is false.

Question 4: Why is epistemic updating critical in scientific research?

  • A) It allows scientists to disregard data that contradict their theories.
  • B) It ensures that scientific theories remain static and unchallenged.
  • C) It enables the refinement of theories based on new empirical evidence.
  • D) It prevents scientists from publishing their research findings.

Question 5: What role does epistemic humility play in epistemic updating?

  • A) It encourages the rejection of any new information.
  • B) It denotes the acknowledgment of the limits of one’s knowledge and the willingness to update beliefs.
  • C) It supports the idea that one’s initial beliefs are infallible.
  • D) It discourages the consideration of alternative viewpoints.

Question 6: In Bayesian terms, what does the “likelihood” represent?

  • A) The probability of observing the new evidence without any prior hypothesis.
  • B) The probability of the hypothesis being true, regardless of the evidence.
  • C) The probability of observing the evidence given that the hypothesis is true.
  • D) The final decision made after considering the evidence.

Question 7: How does epistemic updating relate to decision-making?

  • A) It is irrelevant to the process of making decisions.
  • B) It complicates decision-making by introducing too much information.
  • C) It improves decision-making by incorporating new and relevant information.
  • D) It solely depends on gut feelings rather than evidence.

Question 8: Which field does NOT typically involve epistemic updating?

  • A) Medical diagnosis.
  • B) Investment analysis.
  • C) Scientific research.
  • D) Astrology.

Question 9: What is a key challenge in the process of epistemic updating?

  • A) Finding enough prior beliefs to disregard.
  • B) The difficulty of integrating complex and sometimes contradictory new evidence.
  • C) The ease of changing one’s beliefs without any evidence.
  • D) Ignoring new evidence to maintain simplicity.

Question 10: What is the main goal of epistemic updating?

  • A) To make one’s beliefs immune to change.
  • B) To reduce the amount of information one has to learn.
  • C) To align one’s beliefs as closely as possible with the truth based on available evidence.
  • D) To confirm one’s pre-existing biases without considering new evidence.

Answers

Answer 1: B) Revising one’s beliefs in light of new evidence or information.

Answer 2: C) The initial probability of a hypothesis before new evidence is taken into account.

Answer 3: B) The revised probability of the hypothesis after considering new evidence.

Answer 4: C) It enables the refinement of theories based on new empirical evidence.

Answer 5: B) It denotes the acknowledgment of the limits of one’s knowledge and the willingness to update beliefs.

Answer 6: C) The probability of observing the evidence given that the hypothesis is true.

Answer 7: C) It improves decision-making by incorporating new and relevant information.

Answer 8: D) Astrology.

Answer 9: B) The difficulty of integrating complex and sometimes contradictory new evidence.

Answer 10: C) To align one’s beliefs as closely as possible with the truth based on available evidence.

Epistemic Updating Quiz:

Instructions: Answer each question based on your understanding of how individuals adjust their beliefs in light of new information. Choose the most appropriate answer from the options provided.

  1. Epistemic updating mainly involves: a) Blindly accepting all new information as true. b) Critically evaluating new information and adjusting beliefs accordingly. c) Ignoring new information to avoid changing your mind. d) Relying solely on intuition and gut feelings.
  2. When encountering new evidence that contradicts your existing beliefs, you should: a) Dismiss it immediately as false or untrustworthy. b) Revise your beliefs completely without further analysis. c) Engage in critical evaluation and consider if the evidence warrants revising your beliefs. d) Seek out only information that confirms your existing views.
  3. Cognitive biases can negatively impact epistemic updating by: a) Making individuals more open-minded and receptive to new ideas. b) Leading to unfair judgments and prejudiced interpretations of information. c) Always guaranteeing an accurate understanding of new evidence. d) Helping individuals make quick decisions without overthinking.
  4. A key to effective epistemic updating is: a) Only considering information from sources you already trust. b) Focusing solely on the quantity of new information, regardless of its quality. c) Seeking diverse perspectives and critically evaluating all potential biases. d) Ignoring your existing beliefs and relying solely on the new information.
  5. Updating your beliefs based on personal anecdotes, rather than reliable evidence, is an example of: a) Critical thinking. b) Confirmation bias. c) Open-mindedness. d) Rationality.
  6. It’s generally a good idea to: a) Update your beliefs only when presented with overwhelming evidence. b) Remain rigid and avoid changing your mind, regardless of new information. c) Be flexible and receptive to new evidence, while considering its reliability. d) Trust your gut feeling above all else when evaluating new information.
  7. Which of the following is NOT crucial for evaluating new information effectively? a) Considering the source of the information and its potential biases. b) Understanding the context and background of the information. c) Checking for factual accuracy and logical consistency. d) Accepting everything presented as true without question.
  8. Epistemic updating is relevant to: a) Science and research only. b) Personal decision-making in all areas of life. c) Understanding complex social and political issues. d) All of the above.
  9. What is the ultimate goal of good epistemic updating? a) To never change your mind and hold onto your beliefs rigidly. b) To blindly accept every new piece of information as true. c) To develop and maintain an accurate and informed understanding of the world. d) To win arguments and convince others of your point of view.
  10. How can you improve your epistemic updating skills? a) Avoiding exposure to new information and different perspectives. b) Critically evaluating information, recognizing your own biases, and seeking diverse viewpoints. c) Relying solely on personal opinions and avoiding any form of structured analysis. d) Trusting authority figures and established narratives without questioning them.

Answers:

  1. b) Critically evaluating new information and adjusting beliefs accordingly.
  2. c) Engage in critical evaluation and consider if the evidence warrants revising your beliefs.
  3. b) Leading to unfair judgments and prejudiced interpretations of information.
  4. c) Seeking diverse perspectives and critically evaluating all potential biases.
  5. b) Confirmation bias.
  6. c) Be flexible and receptive to new evidence, while considering its reliability.
  7. d) Accepting everything presented as true without question.
  8. d) All of the above.
  9. c) To develop and maintain an accurate and informed understanding of the world.
  10. b) Critically evaluating information, recognizing your own biases, and seeking diverse viewpoints.

Provide 15 discussion questions relevant to epistemic updating.

  1. How does the concept of epistemic updating challenge the notion of fixed or absolute knowledge?
  2. In what ways can cognitive biases interfere with effective epistemic updating, and how might these obstacles be overcome?
  3. Discuss the role of epistemic humility in the process of updating beliefs. Why is it considered vital for rational inquiry?
  4. How does the Bayesian framework for epistemic updating differ from other models of belief revision? What are its strengths and weaknesses?
  5. Consider the impact of social media and information technology on epistemic updating. Do these platforms facilitate or hinder the process?
  6. Explore the ethical dimensions of epistemic updating. Is there a moral responsibility to update one’s beliefs in light of new evidence?
  7. How can educators promote skills and attitudes conducive to epistemic updating among students?
  8. Discuss the implications of epistemic updating for scientific revolutions. How does it relate to Thomas Kuhn’s concept of paradigm shifts?
  9. How does the concept of epistemic updating apply to interdisciplinary research, where evidence and methodologies may vary widely across fields?
  10. In what ways might cultural and societal norms influence the process of epistemic updating at both individual and collective levels?
  11. Explore the relationship between epistemic updating and decision-making in high-stakes environments, such as military strategy or emergency response.
  12. Discuss the challenges of epistemic updating in the context of deeply held beliefs or ideologies. How can individuals and societies navigate these challenges?
  13. How does confirmation bias affect epistemic updating, and what strategies can be employed to mitigate its effects?
  14. Consider the role of peer review and collaborative research in facilitating epistemic updating within the scientific community. How effective are these processes?
  15. Discuss the potential for artificial intelligence and machine learning tools to assist in the epistemic updating process. What are the possibilities and pitfalls?

Discussion Questions on Epistemic Updating:

Individual & Cognitive Aspects:

  1. How do cultural background and personality traits influence an individual’s approach to epistemic updating?
  2. Can emotions and motivations cloud our ability to objectively evaluate new information? How can we mitigate these influences?
  3. What are the limitations of human cognition in processing and analyzing new information effectively?
  4. How can we overcome cognitive biases like confirmation bias and sunk cost fallacy to improve our epistemic updating?
  5. What role does skepticism play in healthy epistemic updating? Can it hinder progress if taken too far?

Information & Sources:

  1. How can we distinguish between reliable and unreliable sources of information in today’s information overload?
  2. What are the challenges of evaluating information disseminated through social media and echo chambers?
  3. How can we effectively navigate conflicting expert opinions and differing interpretations of data?
  4. What ethical considerations arise when using algorithms and AI-driven information filtering in epistemic updating?

Application & Impact:

  1. How does epistemic updating influence our decision-making processes in areas like personal finances, healthcare, and career choices?
  2. Can effective epistemic updating skills help combat misinformation and the spread of fake news?
  3. What role does critical thinking education play in fostering strong epistemic updating skills in individuals and society?
  4. How can we promote open and respectful dialogue even when individuals hold differing and evolving beliefs?
  5. How can we bridge the divide between experts and the public in effectively communicating scientific findings and fostering evidence-based understanding?
  6. As technology and information landscapes continue to evolve, what new challenges and opportunities will emerge for epistemic updating in the future?

These are just a few prompts to get the conversation started. Feel free to modify, combine, or expand on these questions based on your specific interests and perspectives!

Table of Contents: (Click any link below to navigate to that section.)

  1. What is epistemic updating?
  2. Provide three contexts in which epistemic updating is critical.
    1. 1. Medical Diagnosis and Treatment
    2. 2. Scientific Research and Theory Development
    3. 3. Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
  3. Create a 10-item quiz on epistemic updating with answers at the end.
    1. Quiz: Epistemic Updating
    2. Answers
    3. Epistemic Updating Quiz:
  4. Provide 15 discussion questions relevant to epistemic updating.
    1. Discussion Questions on Epistemic Updating:

Leave a comment

Phil Stilwell

Phil picked up a BA in Philosophy a couple of decades ago. He occasionally teaches philosophy and critical thinking courses in university and industry. He is joined here by ChatGPT 4, GEMINI, CLAUDE, and occasionally Copilot, his far more intelligent AI friends. The five of them discuss and debate a wide variety of philosophical topics I think you’ll enjoy.

Phil curates the content and guides the discussion, primarily through questions. At times there are disagreements, and you may find the banter interesting.

— Goals and Observations

Stay informed!

Sign up for new post notices.

Recent Posts

  • Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz

    Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz was a seminal figure in modern philosophy, contributing to metaphysics, logic, and epistemology. His concept of monads, the principle of sufficient reason, and the idea of the best of all possible worlds… Read more

  • Collapsing Epistemological Terms

    This article delves into the challenges of defining epistemological terms and proposes methods to achieve productive dialogue. It emphasizes collapsing 2nd-order terms into 1st-order concepts like “credence” for clarity and mutual understanding. However, some responses… Read more

  • Dialoguing with Hegel

    Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel’s philosophy has left a lasting impact. While his concept of the dialectic is widely acknowledged, his Absolute Spirit and Absolute Idealism are less accepted due to their speculative and metaphysical nature.… Read more

  • John Locke

    John Locke profoundly influenced modern philosophy, challenging prevailing rationalist views and emphasizing knowledge derived from sensory experiences. His concept of the mind as a “tabula rasa” at birth and his political theories significantly impacted political… Read more

  • Dangers: Awe as an Indicator

    The argument presents an insightful perspective on the subjective nature of beauty and the relationship between the observer and the observed. It questions the idea of objective beauty and challenges anthropocentric viewpoints. It also acknowledges… Read more

  • The Power of Statistics

    Statistics play a crucial role in acquiring truth by providing tools for interpreting data, quantifying uncertainty, and making informed decisions. Its power lies in quantifying evidence, pattern recognition, hypothesis testing, decision-making, understanding variability, and effective… Read more

  • Dialoguing with Charles Sanders Peirce

    Charles Sanders Peirce explains his philosophy, covering pragmatism, semiotics, and the scientific method. Pragmatism evaluates ideas by their practical consequences. Semiotics studies signs: icons, indexes, and symbols. The scientific method involves hypothesis, experimentation, and revision.… Read more

  • Baruch Spinoza

    Baruch Spinoza, a 17th-century Dutch philosopher, significantly influenced modern philosophy by challenging traditional dualistic views and championing reason as the path to knowledge. His deterministic view of the universe led to groundbreaking contributions in monism,… Read more

  • Subjectivity Constrained by the Objective

    Subjective experience, influenced by objective reality, emerges from subjective creatures trying to navigate the world. Objective limitations and neural flexibility shape rich subjectivity, displaying various quirks. Cognitive biases, emotional states, and exploratory nature raise potential… Read more

  • Dialoguing with Epicurus

    Epicurus, an influential ancient Greek philosopher, advocated for pleasure as the highest good, tranquility of the mind, and the moderation of desires. While some of his specific ideas have evolved, they continue to shape contemporary… Read more

  • Faith or Evidence?

    This article explores the tension between citing miracles and advocating for faith as a reason to believe in God. It delves into how these concepts are viewed and reconciled within religious epistemology. The passage also… Read more

  • Testing Prayer

    A definitive prayer test would involve a specific, observable miracle, like restoring amputated limbs, occurring within a set timeframe following prayers directed to a specific God. Control groups would be essential to exclude coincidences and… Read more

  • Dialoguing with Socrates

    Socrates’ philosophy has left a lasting impact on critical thinking and ethical exploration. His Socratic Method continues to inspire dialogue in various fields. The notion of ‘the unexamined life is not worth living’ challenges societal… Read more

  • Monetary Goals

    A rational disposition toward money and possessions involves moderation, value-focused decision-making, and long-term planning, prioritizing experiences over material possessions. Historical figures like Diogenes of Sinope and St. Francis of Assisi found happiness through self-sufficiency and… Read more

  • Thomas Aquinas

    Thomas Aquinas, a Dominican friar and theologian of the 13th century, profoundly impacted Western philosophy by integrating Aristotelian philosophy with Christian doctrine. His influence is seen in Scholasticism, natural law theory, and the synthesis of… Read more

  • Culture-Wide Emotional Dispositions

    This article discusses the cultural aspects of emotional expression in Japanese society and its impact on child development. It emphasizes the influence of cultural norms on emotional expression, the effects of emotional suppression in childhood,… Read more

  • Shades of Certainty

    This article critiques the binary notion of belief, arguing that belief and liking exist on a spectrum rather than as fixed categories. It highlights the linguistic and ontological conflicts of oversimplified binary perspectives and emphasizes… Read more

  • Dialoguing with Aristotle

    This article includes lengthy dialogues involving Aristotle discussing his philosophical ideas with various individuals, such as a curious teenager, another philosopher exploring his philosophy, and a critical philosopher confronting him on weaknesses in his philosophy.… Read more

  • Detecting Bad Science

    This article provides insight into spotting bad science, vulnerable science domains, pressures driving improper science, questions to ask when evaluating scientific claims, a quiz on scientific claims, and discussion questions. It covers sensationalized headlines, conflicts… Read more

  • Our View of Humanity

    A distorted view of human nature can severely distort our beliefs about events involving humans. Each of the distorted views presented impacts our perceptions and interactions. Real-life tragedies, such as those involving Ted Kaczynski and… Read more

  • Appreciating our Insignificance 

    Accepting our cosmic insignificance offers advantages such as humility, perspective, unity, innovation, and resilience. Staying grounded amid ideologies promising cosmic importance involves mindfulness, gratitude, rationality, meaningful connections, and limiting exposure to grandiose narratives. Real-life accounts… Read more

  • Charles Sanders Peirce

    Charles Sanders Peirce was a foundational figure in American philosophy, best known as the progenitor of pragmatism. His ideas significantly influenced logic, the philosophy of science, and semiotics. His lasting mark on philosophy includes pragmatism,… Read more

Recent Posts — Expanded Version
Indicate your interests:

Links to Section Menus